Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Panasonic Corp on Monday unveiled a 50 inch high-definition 3D plasma television

Coming soon to the small screen: TV in 3D

Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:11pm EDT

By Colin Parrott

OSAKA, Japan (Reuters) - You've seen movies in 3D. Now, how about your favorite TV series?

Panasonic Corp on Monday unveiled a 50 inch high-definition 3D plasma television and glasses that make images appear like you can touch them.

At a demonstration at Panasonic's head office in Osaka, Formula One race cars roared right by viewers and gymnasts barreled down a runway, hitting vaulting horse and flipping toward the audience.

"We've introduced concrete plans to deliver the first 3D into people's homes. It won't disappoint," said Yoshiiku Miyata, Panasonic managing executive officer in charge of audio visual products.

He declined to comment on an exact release date or price tag, stating that the company hopes the new TV sets will hit shelves sometime in 2010.

The technology works by tricking the brain into seeing 3D as high-speed shutters in the glasses work in sync with the TV to deliver a double layered image at twice the speed of normal TV.

"When the TV is showing the left image, the shutter closes the right eye so people can see only the left image," explained Keisuke Suetsugi, manager in charge of high quality AV development.

"And the next moment, when the TV is showing the right image, the shutter glass is covering the left."

The company hopes the smaller, more living room friendly 50 inch model will become a popular choice for home theaters than a 103 inch big brother that debuted last October.

The new model will go on display to the public at the CEATEC Japan tech show Oct 6-10.

Panasonic announced in August it will team up with Twentieth Century Fox and Lightstorm Entertainment in the making of Oscar-winning director James Cameron's new 3D film "Avatar," set to open in theaters worldwide this December.

Chief rival electronics maker Sony Corp announced earlier this month it also plans to launch 3D TVs by 2010.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Alternative Content Article - FILM JOURNAL - Choosing alternatives: New programming options eye mainstream acceptance

 



Choosing alternatives: New programming options eye mainstream acceptance

Sept 22, 2009

-By Sarah Sluis


filmjournal/photos/stylus/106648-Choosing_Alternatives_Md.jpg
Exhibitors want audiences to watch sports, concerts and live events in their movie theatres, and audiences are responding.
While alternative content has existed for years on the sidelines, it has yet to become a regular attraction in the moviegoing landscape.
But with the next generation of digital multiplexes and satellite technology, plus a bit of successful legal wrangling, alternative content is
poised to become a consistent presence in movie theatres—or, as they're aching to be called, entertainment complexes.

With the bulk of ticket sales occurring on weekends and holidays, movies are a time-specific business. A live event—be it a weekday
final of a sports game or President Obama's inauguration—gives exhibitors the opportunity to sell out theatres during non-peak times.
"It's all about utilization," explains Tom Stephenson, president and CEO of Dallas, Texas-based Rave Entertainment, noting the success
of the Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert movie during the 2008 Super Bowl weekend. Rave theatres also had
success showing the BCS (Bowl Championship Series) Florida vs. Oklahoma game in live 3D, a breakthrough moment for Cinedigm's
 2K digital-cinema network. The Thursday night event drew in crowds at a quieter time for the theatres, with higher ticket prices to boot.

Bob Goodrich, president of Goodrich Quality Theaters in Grand Rapids, Michigan, measures his success against "the third week of a film
on a Tuesday night. We're not interrupting a film during their first week. I have ten screens per building, so when I have a Fathom event
we never interrupt a movie that opened the past Friday. We always interrupt a movie that's at least in its third week."

While these one-off events can add ancillary revenue to a theatre, they also complicate marketing. Low-cost, Internet-based viral marketing
is the rule. "We're not utilizing mainstream media, television, radio and newspaper," reveals Kurt Hall, president and CEO of National CineMedia,
whose alternative-content division NCM Fathom orchestrates the marketing for the events it distributes. "Those mediums are just too expensive
and thus the model doesn't work. We very heavily rely on in-theatre marketing to support the event, as well as Internet marketing, whether it's to
fan clubs or other Internet organizations that are very highly involved with whatever content that you're showing."

Besides promoting the event in the lobby, pre-show and online, cinemas alert patrons on their e-mail lists. Exhibitors are split on whether e-mail
blasts about these niche events appeal to their regular moviegoers. Ruth Daniels, VP of sales and marketing for Michigan-based circuit Emagine
Entertainment, questions the merit of sending blasts to the theatre's 30,000 members "Most of these people sign up for showtimes, so they're
interested in movies. It doesn't mean they're interested in Green Day [an alternative rock band] or Sugarland [a country band]. Those are two
different audiences right there. You don't know who you're hitting."

Bob Goodrich looks at it a different way. "I'd like to super-serve our core audience—that's where alternative content could really work.
The moviegoer that went to see Inglourious Basterds last weekend would probably go see something Tuesday night as part of alternative
content, because they just love coming to the theatre." He sends e-mail blasts to the 125,000 patrons who receive the "same show clock I
send to my ushers. We let people know two to three weeks in advance, and we often have questions to make our audience interactive.
Sometimes we'll get 2,000 to 3,000 responses to a question."

The debate over the effectiveness of marketing to a theatre's usual moviegoers reflects one of the core questions about alternative content's
audience: Are they regular moviegoers, or those who usually seek their entertainment elsewhere? While conventional wisdom often touts
alternative content as a way to bring in new customers, these added programs also appeal to those who are already filling the theatres.

"You generally find that avid moviegoers are avid out-of-home entertainment pursuers. These are people that get out and go to movies and
go to events," observes Dick Westerling, senior VP of marketing and advertising at the nation's largest circuit, Regal Entertainment. In turn,
these viewers can go on to "create a significant word of mouth to help grow that niche," expanding the audience to people who "maybe aren't
traditional moviegoers, but they'll take it in, because there are markets where you don't have access to watch an opera in any form, or a
Metropolitan Opera performance, in a nice comfortable setting with a good presentation."

Alternative content occupies an intermediary place between television and attending a live event that appeals to audiences. It offers a shared
experience, better presentation, and more of a thrill than watching at home. At the same time, the theatre environment offers more comfort,
convenience and affordability than going to a stadium or opera house.

Alternative-content events can be scaled up or down depending on the expected audience. The Michael Jackson: This Is It concert film, which
will be distributed by Sony this fall for a two-week run, represents a kind of large-scale alternative content that studios such as Disney have pursued.
Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: The Best of Both Worlds Concert
, Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience and The X-Games 3D: The Movie have
had small wide releases of 700 to 1,300 screens, a 3D premium on the ticket prices, and a run that comes with an expiration date. In addition to the
music and sports, they also include behind-the-scenes footage, interviews or vignettes that turn the movies into more than a filmed event. Beyond that,
there's room to attract an even smaller niche. To serve a segment of fervent Michael Jackson fans, Cinedigm stepped in to show a live broadcast of the
Michael Jackson memorial, which the distributor projected live into 85 movie theatres.

The Metropolitan Opera events, Fathom's runaway success, draw audiences that could, and do, attend the opera itself. "People have told us they like it
better than actually going to the Met," notes Hall. "They don't have to get dressed up, you can go to the bathroom whenever you want, you can get popcorn
and Coke while you're watching. The programming itself shows behind-the-scenes in between acts, where they go backstage. Also, the subtitling is on the
screen. If you go to the Met, the subtitling is on the back of the chairs, in front of you, which makes it more difficult to be looking down and up the whole time.
It's every bit as good and in some cases even better than being there."

In partnership with Screenvision, Clearview Cinemas broadcasts select Mets baseball games in New York City-area theatres, including the venerable Ziegfeld,
which is about a 40-minute subway ride from the team's Citi Field. (Screenvision also brings Philadelphia Phillies games to Clearview and National Amusements
theatres in the Philadelphia market.) The $12 events, which have sold out, show the game on a 50 x 23-foot screen and include mascots and giveaways to rile up
fans and create a stadium-like atmosphere.



The price of these events, which is often less than attending a live event, factors into viewers' opinions of alternative content. Stephenson explains, "It's not so
much the price itself; it's the whole value equation. People think that they're doing something they can't do someplace else, and it's a good experience, so they
are willing to pay us more for the extra." Just as the public has shown they're willing to pay extra to see a movie in 3D, they're willing to pay more for sports and concerts.

Among content providers, as well as the studios, there has been some hesitancy to allow these broadcasts, for fear that they may cannibalize existing
entertainment offerings. Content owners may feel that showing their attractions in theatres could discourage people from shelling out full price to go to
the main event. Exhibitors like Paul Glantz, CEO of Emagine, scoff at the idea that one could replace the other. "We now have the ability to measure,
through [Nielsen] EDI and Rentrak, folks that are watching this programming in the home as well as outside the home. The premise that you'll eat away
from television market share and so forth I think is erroneous."

Years ago, Glantz licensed the rights to show World Wrestling Entertainment and pay-per-view events, but when another theatre owner tried to
secure the rights for his own theatre, "the spigot was shut off," and it was determined that the U.S. could not show such content in movie theatres.
The feeling that there is a limited amount of "pie" to share persists today, though it shows signs of changing.

Goodrich laments that live sports games, which he feels could be an "El Dorado" for exhibitors, are not more readily available. "The national baseball,
basketball, football leagues get tens of million of dollars from TV networks. The TV networks are saying, 'We're going to share? I don't think so.'
So, we're blocked."

As digital cinema and alternative content pick up steam, however, that could change, especially as movie studios seem more willing to allow
alternative content in the multiplexes. "A few years ago most of the studios were basically saying, 'Over my dead body are you putting anything
other than a movie in a movie theatre,'" Stephenson recounts, "But all these movie studios are part of big media conglomerates&hellipnow these
guys are saying, 'We create content in all sorts of different places and in all sorts of different ways, and the theatre gives us another channel to
sell our content to an audience.'"

"These are corporations that have a built-in distribution channel, and the means by which to exploit the opportunity to show product in the theatre,
and they've got a business model that already demonstrates that it's profitable. Why they haven't decided to take that opportunity and run with it is
beyond my comprehension," exclaims Glantz.

Instead, alternative content has largely grown through another distribution channel: in-theatre advertising networks, with NCM, Screenvision and
Cinedigm as the leading players in the United States. Events are downloaded or broadcast using the same digital projectors that show pre-screen
advertising. Exhibitors receive a share of the ticket sales, but at a lower percentage than most movies. Depending on the event, there's also a
potential boost in concessions per-capita.

Rave and Emagine, which both book content from Cinedigm, view these revenue streams in markedly different ways. For Emagine theatres,
alternative content is still in a "proof-of-concept" stage, and the profits from these events are considered negligible. "We're very happy to work on
lesser margins here at the outset to demonstrate the viability of alternative content," notes Glantz. "We haven't worried about the economics being
optimized yet for us as exhibitors."

Rave is more enthusiastic about the profits. "We tend to pay out a higher percentage than we would to the film companies, but there's also a higher
ticket price, so the net contribution is terrific from our point of view," enthuses Stephenson.

It also requires more legwork for the exhibitor to make the event profitable. For the 3D BCS game, Rave theatres reached out to sports booster clubs
in the area to raise attendance, and created special food and drink packages to increase concession sales. "These guys tend to have a different desire
than buying a Coke and a hot dog," Stephenson explains, "So it gives you the opportunity to sell a lot of food that really comes with a nice margin."
Both Rave and Emagine sell alcohol, which allows patrons to have a beer with their ball game, and theatre owners to reap the high margins on such drinks.

However, James Dobbin, head of sales for U.K. circuit Vue Entertainment, which shows programming from European content provider Arts Alliance Media,
notes that "each event requires an enormous amount of effort and the financial return is relatively low. Due to the increase in 3D, there is more competition
for the digital screen. For the time being, we are only pursuing those events that we are confident will do well for us."

Amidst the challenges of markets, margins and audiences, the Metropolitan Opera series has emerged as the greatest success, a case study of what works
in alternative content. This fall it will start its fourth season in over 440 U.S. theatres, with an international reach of 900 theatres in 42 countries. Among opera
fans, the Met is regarded as the ne plus ultra, making the programming a "special" event not available, or affordable, everywhere. During each season, Fathom
broadcasts several operas, creating a serialized program. Instead of having to market each event extensively, business is generated through repeat patrons
and word of mouth.

The Metropolitan Opera is also a nonprofit whose general manager, Peter Gelb, has fiercely advocated for expanding the reach of the Met's programming.
Unlike many content providers, who are fearful of overextending their audience, the Metropolitan Opera wants to be more accessible to the public. Showing
the opera in a movie theatre has a side benefit of unseating opera from its stuffy reputation, while still appealing to the opera's core fans. The audience also
includes a significant segment of underserved or non-regular moviegoers. Attendees tend to come from an older demographic that views movies less frequently,
or, as Westerling speculates, those that belong to the class of "upscale, sophisticated moviegoers&hellipprobably the same group that enjoys your independent,
alternative film."

Finally, Fathom has access to Metropolitan Opera's extensive database of ticket buyers, season-ticket holders and more, which has enabled them to reach
exactly the kind of people who would be most interested in attending the opera. In the college town of Ann Arbor, Michigan, for example, the Metropolitan
Opera does "phenomenally well," and for the 2009-2010 season Goodrich has added a second screen for the event, becoming one of just a few in the
country with two screens devoted to the opera.

The Metropolitan Opera, concerts, sports and other events have habituated audiences to the idea of viewing live content in theatres—to an extent.
Without a steady supply, like the seasonal string of Met operas, exhibitors suspect audience demand falters. The executives at Emagine theatres
hope that one day people will come not to catch a movie, but to catch a concert, sports or live event as a matter of course.

"I truly believe that if people get used to seeing alternative content, they'll know that when they come to our theatre there will usually be something
that's going on," Daniels observes. "The availability of more alternative content would help reinforce the image that we're attempting to burnish in the
minds of our guests." Glantz adds, "We want to consider ourselves an entertainment venue as opposed to a pure movie house."

Content owners, too, might become more willing to exhibit their content in movie theatres if they only knew about it. As Fathom has expanded, more
content owners have reached out to the company, instead of the other way around. "As it's clear that there are ready means of distribution available,
there will be more folks coming forward with content," Hall predicts.
Recent Fathom one-night-only specials have included the cast of the TV show "Mystery Science Theater 3000" aiming live barbs at a screening of the
Ed Wood sci-fi cult classic Plan 9 from Outer Space, and former NFL coach Tony Dungy, Peyton Manning and other football stars offering their insights to sports fans.

As for alternative content today, it appears demand outstrips supply. "As we've whetted people's appetites, we get more and more requests." Stephenson
notes. "We continue to get requests, frankly, for more product than we currently can provide."
 







© 2008 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved.


























































































































































































































































Friday, September 18, 2009

BSkyB bullish about 3D

IBC - e Daily
BSkyB bullish about 3D
Share Share
Sunday, 13 September 2009
ImageBSkyB will launch its dedicated 3D channel next year, and Gerry O'Sullivan, Sky's director of strategic product development, asked delegates to IBC to stop reading about TV and to start watching it, writes Chris Forrester.

BSkyB will launch its dedicated 3D channel next year, and Gerry O'Sullivan urged delegates to see the special BSkyB demo, which showcases opera, ballet, and more modern music as well as documentary, movies and sport.

"But let me immediately dispel a few urban myths that have been thrown up about 3D," he said, during the 'Who pays? Winners and losers in the new broadcast economy' session. "You don't have to stand on your head, or be exactly 1.2 metres away from the screen. Nor is it the old Hollywood movies of 30 or 40 years ago. It does not give you a headache. Our HD transmissions require no new technology. The SKY+HD infrastructure carries the signal end-to-end, and we simply piggyback 3D onto our HD investment. Stop reading about 3D, and start watching."

The winners in this business are those who invest in content and continue to invest in innovation," he continued. "The only way you can do both is to have a sustainable business model. If you don't have a sustainable model and you cannot fund innovation then you are going to find life can be very difficult." O'Sullivan says that 2009, despite all the doom and gloom, would see UK pay-TV subscribers top the 50% (of all TV homes) mark. "Remember the sceptics who said pay-TV wouldn't last. Well, to get to 12.5 million pay-TV viewers in the UK is a massive achievement. Subscription revenues are now larger than the total TV advertising revenues. That tells a story on its own. The problem is with broadcasters who are totally reliant on advertising income, and they undoubtedly have some challenges ahead."

O'Sullivan said that for pay-TV broadcasters it was crucial to have a one-to-one relationship with the customer. "We are not a broadcaster who simply sends signals out. We have very direct relationships with our viewer. We have millions of conversations with them every year, and they have a very good way of telling us whether they are satisfied with us or not!"

New Set-Top Box Promises To Bring 3D to Television

The Wall Street Journal

New Set-Top Box Promises To Bring 3D to Television


3D technology is coming one step closer to home with the development of a new set-top box system that will allow consumers to browse through and access 3D offerings from their cable or satellite TV company.

The prototype, developed by digital content security company Nagravision SA, based in Cheseaux, Switzerland, and 3D company 3ality Digital LLC, Burbank, Calif., will be shown at the 3D Entertainment Summit this week in Los Angeles. It's called the Nagra Media Guide for 3D.

Although no cable company has yet committed to the set-top technology, the prototype offers a window into the evolution of 3D home technology, which is getting much closer to what is available in movie theaters. Consumers will be able to access 3D programming using today's set-top boxes, but the Nagra Media version will show the information using 3D graphics.

Television companies have raced to develop TVs that are 3D compatible, and a handful of such televisions have been sold in the U.S. But they are mostly used for games, says David Naranjo, director of product development for Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America.

The problem is that there is a dearth of 3D programming on television. The creators of the prototype hope advances like their set-top box will help prompt producers to create 3D programming. Earlier this year, NBC aired an episode of "Chuck" in 3D, available on analog TVs, but requiring special anaglyph glasses.

The 3D televisions rolling out now mostly require glasses, but they are a step up from anaglyph versions and provide crisper and more realistic pictures.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Disney promotes 3D at consumer show

Disney promotes 3D at consumer show

PHYSICAL: Studio showed A Christmas Carol on Blu-ray with Panasonic components

By Susanne Ault -- Video Business, 9/14/2009

SEPT. 14 | PHYSICAL: Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment anticipates releasing its first theatrical-styled 3D Blu-ray Disc releases as early as fourth quarter 2010.

The studio was making its pitch about the benefits of advanced 3D in the home during Disney's inaugural fan conference, D23, which rolled out Sept. 10-13 in Anaheim, Calif. D23-goers were able to enter a screening room to watch 3D clips of Disney movies, such as upcoming theatrical A Christmas Carol, on Blu-ray via a 3D-enabled Panasonic TV and Blu-ray player.

To date, the public has mostly only been able to enjoy such high-quality, stereoscopic 3D in theaters. Many can't view such technology at home, due to the fact that few own 3D-enabled TVs, which are in limited supply at stores. Plus, there are no stereoscopic 3D DVD or Blu-ray players currently available at retail.

However, Disney wants to prime people for 3D at home's expected 2010 launch, when brand name manufacturers Panasonic, Sony, among others will be selling their first stereoscopic 3D TVs and Blu-ray players. The studio hopes to support this hardware launch with its first 3D Blu-ray titles. Some of Disney's possible 3D candidates for 2010 are upcoming spring 3D theatricals Toy Story 3 and Alice in Wonderland, which should street on Blu-ray by the end of that year.

"We'd love to have our 3D products out as soon as possible, as soon as the holidays 2010," said Gordon Ho, Disney's executive VP of content, marketing and business development, at D23. "I think 3D is positioned very well in the theatrical marketplace. And that is creating demand to see it in the home."

Today, studios have to downgrade their 3D theatricals for home viewing, involving cardboard glasses, which blur colors, because of the lack of the right technology. Disney is among studios excluding a 3D viewing option on such major films as Up due to the fact that they don't want to support inferior products to the originals.

"People are coming [out of the demo] saying they want to try 3D in the home," added Ho. "They didn't think that it could look this good in the home. Once people can see this, we know that there is a market for it."

There is a question of whether people will be motivated to purchase new 3D high-definition TV sets and Blu-ray players, when many have only recently upgraded to the high-def world. But Ho believes that consumers are starting to get interested in purchasing multiple high-def products for their households.

"More and more people are looking to get another HDTV," said Ho. "Many have their first TV and are looking for their second. Many of those [for sale] will be 3D-enabled. We are optimistic [about this market.]"

Conceivably, 3D also could be engineered for standard-definition discs. But most manufacturers are committing to building 3D into Blu-ray players, in support of offering the best overall experience possible. Disney is steering its advanced 3D titles to Blu-ray as well.

The Blu-ray Disc Assn. expects to complete universal 3D specifications for disc creation at the end of 2009, paving the way for 2010 titles. One major issue has been figuring out how to deal with encoding relatively large capacity 3D video within the maximum 50GB space on Blu-ray discs.

The 3D video shown during the Disney D23 demo was encoded using a new version of the AVC codec, dubbed AVC Multi-View Codec, or AVC-MVC.

Disney also utilized D23 to encourage people to adopt the Blu-ray format. People could watch side-by-side comparisons of DVD and Blu-ray and could enter to win a new Blu-ray player.

The studio is readying a new Web site to further push Blu-ray, www.Disneyupgrade2Blu.com, which is designed to make the public's transition to high-def as easily as possible. The studio will be advertising the site within trailers that precede its major fourth-quarter titles. Also, the site will be promoted through standard DVD inserts, featuring coupons for Blu-ray title purchases.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Eutelsat supportive of 3D standards

Eutelsat supportive of 3D standards

By Julian Clover
September 12, 2009 06.52 UK 

robert-3DIBC 2009 – Amsterdam. Eutelsat Communications has given its backing to the emerging standards surrounding the broadcast of 3D television in Europe.

Demonstrating its capability over the Eurobird 9A satellite (9 degrees East), Walter Munarini of Eutelsat subsidiary Open Sky said the operator's chosen system was capable of running on an existing HD receiver, through a new 3D compatible television display.

"We know standards always look for the perfect view, but we are deeply involved in the standards that allows us to roll it out now." Munarini told the assembled press. "Hopefully the standard will then come with something that is backwards compatible with what we have now."

The Eutelsat system is at its most basic level in line with the 3D technology developed by BSkyB, which puts the emphasis on the purchase of a new 3D display – at an estimated cost in 2010 of €2,000 – as opposed to a new set-top receiver.

Monday, September 7, 2009

How Sky 3D is drawing closer - Sky's Brian Lenz talks up the third dimension


Interview: How Sky 3D is drawing closer

Sky's Brian Lenz talks up the third dimension

May 26th | Tell us what you think [ 2 comments ] 

sky-3d

No, WE wear the glass...oh never mind

It's been almost six months since Sky showed off its 3D showreel to the world's media and revealed that it could broadcast it through its existing equipment.

Head of Product Design and Innovation, Brian Lenz, is the man pushing to bring a third dimension to UK televisions and, in an extensive interview with TechRadar, he explains how tasks like filming the world's fastest man running through Deansgate and making the National Ballet 3D are allowing Sky to learn valuable lessons.

TechRadar: It was December that Sky opened its doors to the media andshowed off its 3D, how have things progressed towards it arriving in our living rooms?

Brian Lenz: So I think that what we saw back at that event was between 60 to 80 per cent of what I would consider broadcast quality, with the footage of Ricky Hatton boxing at maybe 80 per cent and the football clips and Gladiators at 60 per cent.

What we wanted to see was how close to broadcast quality we could get and make it a genuine option rather than a decision that is fraught with technical complexity and a logistical nightmare to film things in 3D.

SKY 3D: Bringing a new dimension to the National Ballet

Simultaneously we have looked to move 3D into the other genres we cover. We've targeted some arts content to get away from sports and test on something completely different. We've been shooting with the National Ballet and it's the most beautiful footage that we've shot so far.

It's absolutely broadcast quality, we hit that mark and we've proved to ourselves that we can do it and shown the value of 3D visually. John Lassiter said about 3D that it is 'removing one more of the barriers from the suspension of disbelief'. You are removing the screen from the equation and to see the depth that it brings to the National Ballet is the best version of that we've managed so far.

Next Page: The world's fastest man

TR: TechRadar covered the fact that you had filmed the highly publicisedUsain Bolt 150 metres run in Manchester recently – what challenges did this create for your team?

BL: 3D can enhance the visual experience of a range of genres and the opportunity came up with Usain Bolt. How do you shoot someone so fast in a setup that is not necessarily set up to be that dynamic in two dimensions? How can we rise to the challenge to do something different in that regard?

The big thing we did was that we used a combination of cranes and a rail cam. The rail cam was probably the most significant thing. What was important was that we could mount two cameras to shoot 3D on a rail and keep it steady enough.

ZOOM: Sky films runner over 150m

There were problems with the bounce when we started, and the impact of cameras not in perfect alignment in 3D is massive. The 3D impact was nauseous – it felt as if you were in a barrel rolling down a hill! What we managed to do was add some dampening which gave us a perfectly smooth run.

We ended up with stride for stride footage in 3D – we were blessed with the rain clearing up at the right time – and with the moisture glistening on the track that footage was beautiful.

Next Page: Lessons learned

TR: There are obviously a lot of lessons to be learned in how to film things in 3D, with a full-sized IMAX screen, things popping off the side don't matter as much as with a small screen where it really jars, for instance. What tips are you picking up?

BL: With all that shooting we feel we're hitting the quality mark and we know what we need to do, but for live 3D shooting we still need to get the efficiency. Right now because it's not every event being filmed in 3D we are still getting a lot of 'didn't expect that' moments.

There's different challenges that you need to work through, but we want to be able to roll in with an OB [outside broadcast] truck the night before, film in 3D and then roll out again the next day.

It is a different way of filming; what we are finding is that it's coming down to how you frame the shot. Cameramen have really good ideas of the mechanics and physics and the artist's eye to frame shots and if you show them 3D footage it's a pretty quick turnaround for them to start framing shots.

CLOSE-UP: Sky's 3D Rig in action

The bigger thing is more around getting them comfortable with not having to pan off of something as fast. You have to let the action roll out of frame rather then trying to keep it in the frame.

To be honest the biggest thing we have to get right now how to make that point of convergence across all the different cameras so you don't get that jarring sensation when you switch between different shots.

Next Page: James Cameron's Avatar

TR: Avatar is obviously hotly anticipated, but do you feel like it could be a pivotal moment in bringing 3D to a wider audience and, ultimately, pushing it into our living rooms?

BL: I think so. James Cameron seems to like putting pressure on himself. He took Titanic, where everyone knew how it was going to end, and took realistic CGI to a new level, and if he takes the same artistic sense along with his technical knowledge to 3D then it will be huge.

I'd hesitate to say that it's a make or break moment, but I do think that it's a significant moment. If he pulls it off – and personally speaking I don't doubt that he will - then it will be absolutely massive in terms of making 3D more popular.

TR: How important was being able to show that you could put 3D through existing Sky boxes?

BL: The big question was can we get 3D through our existing infrastructure and if we hadn't then I don't think we'd be doing anything like what we are doing now. If we hadn't been able to use the existing HD boxes then I think it would just be a novelty on our timeline; something that we might be doing in the future.

Because we don't touch infrastructure it means that all the investment can go towards the content, which is where you want to be.

LIGHTNING BOLT: But is 3D a flash in the pan?

TR: The credit crunch is really biting into people's budgets, do you feel like this has delayed the arrival of 3D sets in living rooms and delayed the chance to get Sky 3D into homes?

BL: I'm not sure if it has. From our perspective we see that next year has significant launches of 3D televisions, which is probably about the reasonable time frame anyway.

I won't proclaim to be an economic expert but consumer electronic sales seem to be holding quite well and Sky has gone from strength to strength.

I don't want to pretend that it doesn't have some impact. If people aren't moving home then there's not that need to buy the big television. I think you'll see stuff happen next year because the TV manufacturers themselves want and need something new.

Everyone hoping [3D] is not a flash in the pan and it all circles back between symbiotic relationship between content and televisions – if the content is there then the push for TVs will start to accelerate.

TR: The most common criticism of 3D is that it is a gimmick, are you convinced that 3D is something that the consumers want enough to invest in?

BL: I think so. I think that there is something intriguing there and of the people who wouldn't be impressed by technically gimmickry many of those are gobsmacked by the footage we have already shot so I would say there's something different about this.

I'm not sure that in five to ten years that the whole schedule will go into 3D, but appropriate events, movies of the weeks, special documentaries and things like major football matches can absolutely be worthwhile.

You put on the glasses to watch something that you are keen to see in a special way rather than a whole evening's viewing.